French (Fr)English (United Kingdom)

DPC NEWS: a website dedicated to Penetrant Testing and Magnetic Testing

DPC

Search

mod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_counter
visits on site since April 2008

Log in

DPCNews


Receive HTML?

Edito 2015

September / October / November 2015 : Solvent-based developer or non-aqueous wet developer ?

Print
E-mail
Written by Dubosc
Friday, 11 September 2015 23:57

We have already devoted many editorials to the terminology used in penetrant testing (PT) and magnetic particle testing (MT).

We always recommend that the authors of standards, specifications, training courses, multiple-choice questionnaires and any other document comply with the terminology, so that everyone can understand each other.

Last Updated ( Saturday, 12 September 2015 00:29 )

June/July/August 2015 : Terminology discrepancies between ISO and ASTM standards

Print
E-mail
Written by Dubosc
Friday, 15 May 2015 08:15

In our December 2013 Editorial(1), we reported that with regard to penetrant testing (PT) and magnetic particle testing (MT), there were some differences between the EN/ISO standards and the ASTM E1316 standard and we provided some examples.

Last Updated ( Friday, 15 May 2015 10:04 )

March-May 2015 :NDT documents: if two signatures were enough!

Print
E-mail
Written by Dubosc
Thursday, 19 February 2015 12:14

The attention of one of us was drawn about conversations on LinkedIn emanating from Filitsa Tileli, NDT Engineer at Strata, as Top Contributor.

Here are the contents:

Last Updated ( Thursday, 19 February 2015 12:29 )